Sunday, January 22, 1967
Press interview • Interview of Paul McCartney
Last updated on August 21, 2024
Interview location: 7 Cavendish Avenue, St John’s Wood, London, UK
Previous interview Jan 16, 1967 • Paul McCartney interview for International Times
Article Jan 21, 1967 • Paul McCartney attends a party organised by Julie Felix
Article Jan 22, 1967 • Paul McCartney films the Rolling Stones at the Palladium
Interview Jan 22, 1967 • Paul McCartney interview for The Sunday Times
Article Jan 24, 1967 • Paul McCartney and Brian Epstein discuss The Beatles' third film with Joe Orton
Article Jan 24, 1967 • Hoax in Glasgow: Paul McCartney doesn't show up
Next interview February 1967 • The Beatles interview for The Beatles Monthly Book
AlbumThis interview was made to promote the "The Family Way - Original Soundtrack Recording (Stereo - UK)" Official album.
This interview remains the property of the respective copyright owner, and no implication of ownership by us is intended or should be inferred. Any copyright owner who wants something removed should contact us and we will do so immediately.
On January 16, 1967, at tea time, Paul McCartney was interviewed by The Sunday Times journalist, Derek Jewell, in his London home. The interview was published on January 22, 1967.
Paul put on the solitary tune yet recorded for a new Beatles album. It’s basically Lennon’s, and is called ‘Strawberry Fields’, named after a Liverpool approved school for girls. One repeated phrase runs, ‘Nothing is real, nothing to get hung about.’
Paul: “We’ve, all of us, grown up in a way that hasn’t turned into a manly way. It’s a childish way. That’s why we make mistakes. We’ve not grown up within the machine. We’ve been able to live very independent lives. But now, we’re ready to go our own ways. We’ll work together only if we miss each other. Then it’ll be hobby work. It’s good for each of us to go it alone. Two years ago I was worried about money, but now, I’m surprised to find that I’m rich, yet, I’m not miserable. I’ve noticed, over the last five years, how people are clinging more and more to the material things. I’m sad, because Britain is going the American way in this. I know we four would be scruffy, dirty and obscene to the Americans if we didn’t have money.”
Politics?
Paul “How can you be specific in politics? Everybody is trying to do the same thing, get power! The idea of people fighting en masse over land is so maniac, so chaotic, that, in the end, everyone must be intelligent enough to see the madness of it. I’m desperate about what is happening in Vietnam. But what happens if you identify with the other side? You lose the power to sway people. What could we do? Well, I suppose that, at a Royal Command Performance, we could announce a number and then tell people exactly what we thought about Vietnam! But then, we’d be thought to be lunatics! The only way I can see is to talk to people straight, at a professional level, and say, ‘Look, I’m not a nut. This is what I believe.’ If you keep saying it, maybe people will see you’re not a nut. All this, ‘Pull together now for England’ is great, till you know what the people who run things really think of you, the plebs. Just like Parliament now, ‘We’ve got to rule you,’ they’re saying, ‘So let’s get on with it! We don’t want you seeing us on TV!’ Isn’t it ridiculous?”
His ambitions?
Paul: “I have no ambition to be a writer. I couldn’t write more than a couple of words without being embarrassed. For me, it’s too flowery. I have no ambition to be a conventional film-score composer, because it’s too regimented, you know, fitting music into small slots. There’s no freedom. In the end, I don’t know what I’ll do. I’ll have a go at anything. Something will turn up.”
Notice any inaccuracies on this page? Have additional insights or ideas for new content? Or just want to share your thoughts? We value your feedback! Please use the form below to get in touch with us.